Fluoride: The Hard to Swallow Truth

  • More Options

VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
Rating: 6.8/10 (50 votes cast)
Is This Documentary Broken?
(Click Here To Let Us Know)

This short documentary looks at the initial theories behind the
effectiveness of fluoride and where it originated. It goes on to show
the lack of science behind the use of Fluoride and reveals Fluoride as
a toxic waste substance that is being pumped into our drinking water.
The documentary will conclude by delivering the “hard to swallow
truth” of fluoride which pertains to why it is actually used.

Fluoride: The Hard to Swallow Truth, 6.8 out of 10 based on 50 ratings

Related Documentaries

From The Web

  • rgdaniel

    Wikipedia: The fluoridation of water is known to prevent tooth decay

    and is considered by the U.S.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    as “one of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century”.

  • rgdaniel

    Wikipedia: The fluoridation of water is known to prevent tooth decay

    and is considered by the U.S.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    as “one of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century”.

    • Tokitysmokes

      You should watch docs before you comment on them.

    • SnowyOwl

      Obviously havent seen the documentary. Where the CDC states all of the issues with fluoride. Another person who blindly follows things without doing any research.

      • Respect?

        how do you guys know he didnt watch? I mean, aside from his lazy post…is there some way to see what movies people have viewed? GASP mine is all sex and bill hicks!

      • Respect?

        how do you guys know he didnt watch? I mean, aside from his lazy post…is there some way to see what movies people have viewed? GASP mine is all sex and bill hicks!

        • Anonymous

          At least you will be funny in bed…

        • Anonymous

          Well said. These tinfoil hatters assume anything

      • Anonymous

        lol this quote is from the doc: ..”is considered by the U.S.

        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

        as one of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century”.

    • Anonymous

      Same with what the other people said, you should watch the doc first.

      Also, Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information, lol.

  • Dr.Pierre Griffith d.m.d.

    I am a dentist and I always have had doubts about fluoridation of our drinking water. I have seen the harm that too much fluoride can do to your teeth and bones. I am convinced that the best and safest drinking water is water without chemicals of any kind. I would recommend that you tell your dentist that you do not want any topical fluoride applications and cleaning with products that contain fluoride. If he refuses or tells you that fluoride is safe and that you should trust him, tell him that you will find another dentist who agrees with you. Don’t let him intimidate you with his DDS or DMD diploma and his doctor title, fluoride is not good for you.

  • Dr.Pierre Griffith d.m.d.

    I am a dentist and I always have had doubts about fluoridation of our drinking water. I have seen the harm that too much fluoride can do to your teeth and bones. I am convinced that the best and safest drinking water is water without chemicals of any kind. I would recommend that you tell your dentist that you do not want any topical fluoride applications and cleaning with products that contain fluoride. If he refuses or tells you that fluoride is safe and that you should trust him, tell him that you will find another dentist who agrees with you. Don’t let him intimidate you with his DDS or DMD diploma and his doctor title, fluoride is not good for you.

    • Mol

      “If he refuses or tells you that fluoride is safe and that you should
      trust him, tell him that you will find another dentist who agrees with
      you.” No I will not. I will not take orders from someone on a message board.

      IF you are a dentists your opinion is no less valid than this one dentist you describe who apparantly says “trust him”. However, you opinion is considerably less valid than the majority of dentists and professional dental organisations across the world that support the fluoridisation of water.

      • Johnny

        Why would anyone trust a dentist to tell them if fluoride is safe for anything other than their teeth?

        Dentists can tell us it’s safe and maybe good for our teeth or possibly not, I want an actual doctor to tell me the other health dangers to my body or mind.

        9/10 dentists agree that people shouldn’t seek medical advice for anything other than teeth from a dentist.

        The other one probably feels you up in his/her chair.

      • Johnny

        Why would anyone trust a dentist to tell them if fluoride is safe for anything other than their teeth?

        Dentists can tell us it’s safe and maybe good for our teeth or possibly not, I want an actual doctor to tell me the other health dangers to my body or mind.

        9/10 dentists agree that people shouldn’t seek medical advice for anything other than teeth from a dentist.

        The other one probably feels you up in his/her chair.

        • DUH!!

          Why would anyone trust ANYONE simply based on their position or profession? As if career, training, or expertise has any relation whatsoever to a person’s honesty.  DUH!!!

          • DUH!!!

            And who would you trust? The people behind money-spinning ‘documentaries? DUH!!!

          • DUH!!!

            And who would you trust? The people behind money-spinning ‘documentaries? DUH!!!

    • Skeptic

      I highly doubt you are a dentist.  My dentist lets me chose to either have fluoride treatment or not, he has never tried to intimidate me one way or another.  I say you are either a liar “Dr” Griffith or a quack, or possibly both. 

      • AMN

        If what the documentary has said is correct, your dentist is not aware of the harm fluoride is causing. furthermore, you, and your dentist, have demonstrated the notion we do not realize we have been made to circum to this proposed system.

  • Anonymous

    I can’t wait for the 2nd American revolution (2012) :)

    All I know from watching documentaries is that sh*ts gonna hit the fan one day and I think it will be sooner then later.

  • Documentarylover

    GREAT documentary!

    • JKL

      CRAP documentary! 

  • Jgb983

    Was this documentary made because everyone is dying from flouride?

    • JaZee

      Exactly. People are not dying from the effects of fluoride in water, rather they have benefited by it. So why was the ‘documentary’ made? Possibly a money making scam aimed at the vulnerable and mentally weak.

  • Anonymous

    Wow non-fluoridated areas have had less caries also……but I bet they use fluoridated toothpaste….

    • Skeptic

      Fluoride actually occurs naturally in any water, unless its filtered out.  You can have that checked.  So who knows who much fluoride was drank by the people the non-fluoridated areas unless the base line levels were checked first. 

      • Johnny

        There are different types of fluoride and most are harmless like the naturally occurring types, what they add to the water is literally pollution. 

        There are in fact some toxic fluoride levels in natural water in some places too but it is not a natural process, rather a byproduct of the unnatural pollution.

        It was that pollution being a problem that led them to decide to put it into our water supplies directly instead of just dispersing it in the environment to get rid of it.

        But there is still some fluoride pollution today, and the solution should be finding a way of disposing of it without risking danger to the environment at large or human beings either.

        And no the “either way it gets into the water, so who cares” argument doesn’t fly with me – both are preventable. Neither are that profitable though.

        But hey, there is one positive aspect of it so if we just focus on that and ignore the bad stuff no bad stuff will ever happen…

        • F. Donaldson

          “There are different types of fluoride”

          What are these?

  • Pingback: Flouride, 98% of EU is against it, it is considered a Poison.

  • Kevin Heinrichsohn

     Documentary, or propaganda?
    -Use ‘man on the street’ interviews, handpicking the ones you want…check
    -Present only one side of a debate…check
    -Use scare-words like “toxic” and “chemical” ad nauseum…check

    This is a very poor “documentary”, and is NOT of the objectiveness that I visit this site to see.

    • D-bakes

       Fool.

      • DCt

        No he’s not. Kevin Heinrichsohn’s comments are spot on.

        • Sdf

          You brushed your teeth too much with fluoride

        • Sdf

          You brushed your teeth too much with fluoride

    • D-bakes

       Fool.

    • Reason

      This is some more evidence towards the harmful effects of Fluoride http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/ .
      And i did not quite clearly understand as to what you are trying to indicate by talking about “only one side of a debate”.
      Do you actually feel that Artificial Fluoride addition to drinking water or any other consumable sources is of any use?

    • Reason

      This is some more evidence towards the harmful effects of Fluoride http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/brain/ .
      And i did not quite clearly understand as to what you are trying to indicate by talking about “only one side of a debate”.
      Do you actually feel that Artificial Fluoride addition to drinking water or any other consumable sources is of any use?

    • http://www.facebook.com/margot.nowdays.9 Margot Nowdays

      Kevin, besides the “documentary” “manipulation”, the point is still the same: Is Fluoride good o bad?

  • Johnny

    Something that carries a warning to contact poison control if ingested in relatively small amounts in toothpaste form should not be put into something that is encouraged to be ingested frequently in significant amounts.

    That is the commonsense approach to this issue, plain and simple.

    But many people these days ignore commonsense as long as the “majority of experts agree…”.

    Note: most toothpastes now just say “see data file…” online or some such thing where the actual warning is posted rather than having the warning on the tube/package(all kids fluoridated toothpastes must have it on the tube/package I believe though).

  • Johnny

    Something that carries a warning to contact poison control if ingested in relatively small amounts in toothpaste form should not be put into something that is encouraged to be ingested frequently in significant amounts.

    That is the commonsense approach to this issue, plain and simple.

    But many people these days ignore commonsense as long as the “majority of experts agree…”.

    Note: most toothpastes now just say “see data file…” online or some such thing where the actual warning is posted rather than having the warning on the tube/package(all kids fluoridated toothpastes must have it on the tube/package I believe though).

    • John

      The problem with the “commonsense approach” is they can sometimes be overly simple. Your claim that because fluoride is posionous it must be avoided is overly simplified to the point of being critically flawed.

      Consider there are many substances that can be extremely unpleasant to the human body but conversely are essential to its healthy function. Two examples are selenium & phosphorus.

      Without selenium & phosphorus humans suffer, and deficiency can result in severe health conditions & even death … but both of these substances can also be exceptionally harmful.

      What is important if the nature & extent of exposure

      • Johnny The MasterChef ?

        “encouraged to be ingested frequently”

        Who encourages toothpaste is eaten?

        Is it used as a sandwich filling oer perhaps a relish on burgers?

        • Johnny

          Cute, but I was referring to water.

          @ John – Fluoride in toothpaste is proven to be valuable so long as it isn’t swallowed in dangerous amounts, fluoridating water has no proven effects that add anything more than just using fluoridated toothpaste alone provides while adding many possible health problems for the rest of your body.

          I sincerely hope you are joking when saying fluoride is like other things which are required for life to be sustained, unless you have a scientific study that shows that human beings can not survive without the possible tooth protection provided by fluoride?

          If someone wants to use fluoride in toothpaste they can choose to do so, adding it to the water is completely unnecessary and downright Orwellian in it’s ideal of jeopardizing people’s greater bodily health in the name of supposedly having fewer cavities.

          Forcing a potentially dangerous substance down people’s throats is disturbing to me, especially when the possible ill-effects of smoking pot supposedly are the reason it is illegal and punishable with prison time, even though it has far more medicinal value than fluoride ever will.

          What’s the difference? The difference is in the similarity – its all about what is profitable(or not) for the corporations behind it.

          When the risks outweigh any possible rewards commonsense is commonsense… unless you prefer to trust the “expert opinions” instead.

          • John

            “I sincerely hope you are joking when saying fluoride is like other things which are required for life to be sustained ..”

            Please re-read my comment; I never said that.

            My comments about the necessity or harm of selenium & phosphorus depending on exposure were to illustrate the flaw in your reasoning of: ” Something that carries a warning to contact poison control if ingested
            in relatively small amounts in toothpaste form should not be put into
            something that is encouraged to be ingested frequently in significant
            amounts”

          • Berislava

            As Johhny can not understand a few sentences in your comment it’s hardly surprising he believes the hog was in this video.

          • Berislava

            As Johhny can not understand a few sentences in your comment it’s hardly surprising he believes the hog was in this video.

  • Slapme

     What a bunch of idiots.  Seriously?  What a useless and harmful piece of media.

  • Eatfluo

     You realize I hope that eating too much of anything can be toxic.  You can actually die from too much water in your body – hyponatremia.  Only ignorant gits would take this video to heart.  Back up your opinions with some real data from real sources and not the crazy people on the fringe who insist on everything being a conspiracy theory.

    • Equinox

      Which part of your comment has anything to do with anything in this video? “Too much of anything can be toxic”. Well yes, that’s true, but fluoride actually is toxic waste. You do not need to be a highly intelligent person, like yourself, to see that you do not want this substance to be going into your body. “Back up your opinions with some real data from real sources”. This information (not opinion) comes from actual study done by highly respected people (real sources) in the field. “Only ignorant gits would take this video to heart”. Attacking people on a personal level, never gets old. “Crazy people on the fringe who insist on everything being a conspiracy theory”. An other fine classic example. Sure, the reasons ‘why’ goverments are doing this lie open for debate. But what you are doing is insulting, not debating. Which is exactly what, for example, religious people do when you face them with facts about the unlikelyness regarding their believes. When all the arguments fall burning down to the ground; they either start insulting the opposing party (in hope their victims fall silent due to shock), or throw it all on the ‘God phenomenon’. Which in this case, you are doing both. You do not think fluoride is bad for you? Ok, show us why. You do not think fluoride is one of the factors helping goverments control the masses? Again, show us why. And remember, ‘just, because’ is not an argument. It is you inferring to the stupidity of other people. I myself am not a ‘conspiracy-geek’, but I also do not discard the idea for its possibility. In fact, I have seen more events and details that would lead me into believing its plausibility, than to throwing it out all together. Keep an open mind people, things aren’t always what you believe them to be.  

      • GuyFarrar

        “but fluoride actually is toxic waste.” No it isn’t. Fluoride is toxic above a certain concentration (and safe below) but it is not a waste.

        “You do not think fluoride is one of the factors helping goverments control the masses? Again, show us why.” That is asking for a negative to be proved. Also, it is beholdant on those making wild claims to provide substantial evidence rather than for doubters to disprove the outlandish claims.

        • Eatfluo

          I guess Equinox is all for guilty until proved innocent.  I agree the people making the wild claims need to provide substantial evidence to change the paradigm not the other way around.  I would love to see some shred of evidence how fluoride aids in the control of the masses.  And as for the people in Uganda with less cavities – I bet when the data was taken practically no one was drinking multiple sodas per day as many do here in the US – likely either not available or not affordable.  I love the commercial with how the guy driving the coke truck brings smiles everywhere – he also likely brings tooth decay and diabetes too.

          • Equinox0023

            To the people above:

            Let me define my definition of toxic waste.
            A poisonous substance which is a by product (or aimed product) to an industrial process, which has no practical use (commodity) into aiding health or well being of life.

            Sure it is safe below a certain amount, but that amount is insanely low (25 milligrams does damage, 10 grams becomes deadly. Has all been proven).
            This does not matter if the substance would have benefits. Worth the risk, so to speak.
            But industrial sodium- fluoride (, sodium silicofluoride and fluorosilic acid), has none of the benefitial qualities (health-wise) that have been written onto it. All these given qualities (health-wise), come from an other substance. Natural occuring fluoride. 
            It does have qualities that are benefitial, but these have nothing to do with aiding your teeth. Or anything regarding your body, for that matter.

            Some people above point out it is ridiculous to ask for prove for some ideas. Which they stand correct on. But I never did so.
            All I ask, is, to not just blur out hate-filled remarks, but tell why you disagree on the subject. And if you must, give your personal reasons for disliking such ideas.
            “Admiration brings knowledge, disgust makes blind”.

            And once again, I am not a ‘conspiracy-geek’. I just state facts as I see them.
            True, I do not have light feelings for our way of life. But it has nothing to do with conspiracies.

            Maybe it’s a language thing, for english is not my first one. Maybe I have a different picture in my head for certain words, I do not know. But for some reason, people do not see what I am saying. 

            Eatfluo
            “I guess Equinox is all for guilty until proved innocent.”
            What? I do not see how you could get that from my words.
            For I am realy not.
            Although, it is an interesting concept (applied to the world today). If everybody would have to prove that what they were doing was for the good of everybody..

            One last funny thing, all the positive words on the subject of industrial fluoride, come from America. I live in Europe, where you will not find one study (that does not originate from America, or is done by people who work for american companies). that will agree.

            Just keep your mind open, do not fall into predudice.
            “A different reality is just as likely as this one”.

        • Eatfluo

          I guess Equinox is all for guilty until proved innocent.  I agree the people making the wild claims need to provide substantial evidence to change the paradigm not the other way around.  I would love to see some shred of evidence how fluoride aids in the control of the masses.  And as for the people in Uganda with less cavities – I bet when the data was taken practically no one was drinking multiple sodas per day as many do here in the US – likely either not available or not affordable.  I love the commercial with how the guy driving the coke truck brings smiles everywhere – he also likely brings tooth decay and diabetes too.

      • GuyFarrar

        “but fluoride actually is toxic waste.” No it isn’t. Fluoride is toxic above a certain concentration (and safe below) but it is not a waste.

        “You do not think fluoride is one of the factors helping goverments control the masses? Again, show us why.” That is asking for a negative to be proved. Also, it is beholdant on those making wild claims to provide substantial evidence rather than for doubters to disprove the outlandish claims.

      • Wilson Pj 1

        Well said my friend…

      • Wilson Pj 1

        Well said my friend…

        • Guest

          Well said what? Equinox’s comments indicates a very severely limited scientific understanding, and an extremely twisted outlook on life.

          For example: asking someone to prove goverments are not using aerial spraying to control the masses, whereas such bizarre claims require conclusive support and not proof against.

          Amazingly after describing a global conspiracy he / she noted “I myself am not a ‘conspiracy-geek’”.

          And, as another person noted, he / she claims fluoride is a ‘toxic waste”. The waste from what????

    • Equinox

      Which part of your comment has anything to do with anything in this video? “Too much of anything can be toxic”. Well yes, that’s true, but fluoride actually is toxic waste. You do not need to be a highly intelligent person, like yourself, to see that you do not want this substance to be going into your body. “Back up your opinions with some real data from real sources”. This information (not opinion) comes from actual study done by highly respected people (real sources) in the field. “Only ignorant gits would take this video to heart”. Attacking people on a personal level, never gets old. “Crazy people on the fringe who insist on everything being a conspiracy theory”. An other fine classic example. Sure, the reasons ‘why’ goverments are doing this lie open for debate. But what you are doing is insulting, not debating. Which is exactly what, for example, religious people do when you face them with facts about the unlikelyness regarding their believes. When all the arguments fall burning down to the ground; they either start insulting the opposing party (in hope their victims fall silent due to shock), or throw it all on the ‘God phenomenon’. Which in this case, you are doing both. You do not think fluoride is bad for you? Ok, show us why. You do not think fluoride is one of the factors helping goverments control the masses? Again, show us why. And remember, ‘just, because’ is not an argument. It is you inferring to the stupidity of other people. I myself am not a ‘conspiracy-geek’, but I also do not discard the idea for its possibility. In fact, I have seen more events and details that would lead me into believing its plausibility, than to throwing it out all together. Keep an open mind people, things aren’t always what you believe them to be.  

  • MedTed

     I love the part about how fluoride “rots” the enamel.  What a load.  Just another of several mistakes in this poorly done video.  Not surprised that the average person doesn’t know what fluoride is in the water for.  The average person doesn’t floss either I bet.  I will also bet if I ask my dental hygienist if she uses fluoride that she does.  I also bet that she doesn’t have any cavities either.  I am not going to say there is a link here though as I bet she also just plain keeps her teeth really clean.  I don’t know that there is much to debate here because as Equinox said it like dealing with religious people who are not open to debate, except here its someone who insists that the world, but mostly the government and dentists are out to get you.  By the way beta-carotene from carrots is toxic in too high amounts too.  Maybe you should stop eating vegetables as well.  Its just another form of mind control anyway.  Ha Ha Ha…

  • anonymous

    This documentary was fantastic. I learned a lot and will pass it on. Thank you for your time and work into this video.

    • Malone

      Please don’t pass it on … the video is absoulte garbage. It is a money making scam that has no basis in science, facts or honesty.

  • Xexyzl

    Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk, ice cream? Ice cream, Mandrake? Children’s ice cream!…You know when fluoridation first began?…1946. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It’s incredibly obvious, isn’t it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That’s the way a hard-core Commie works.

  • Anonymous

    “Do you feel it’s safe to put flouride in our water?”

    Yes.

    “Do you feel it’s safe for us to drive cars?”

    Yes.

  • DD

    An absolute must see – links are incredible !

    Fluoride: The Bizarre History – Full Documentary

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH_y3Cw8MVg

  • http://www.dianabuckland.webs.com/ Dianedraytonbuckland

    see firewaterfilm.com            http://www.fluoridealert.org

    Tasmania Australia first fluoridated in 1953 and ongoing through all Australia -  all states fluorosilicic acid/silicofluoride poisoned (aka water fluoridation) (& contains co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium etc)    – heavy % ‘fluoridation’ in all Australia – mental health, dental health,  alzheimers, kidney disease crises and bone diseases.  This toxic waste pollutant must stop being added to our water supplies.

  • Average Girl

    None of these types of documentaries fully explain WHY toxins such as fluoride (reduces fertility, increases heart disease, lowers IQ), thimerosal (mercury in vaccines), aspartaame (turns to toxic wood alcohol in the body), MSG (neurotoxin), high fructose corn syrup (neurotoxin with mercury byproduct), BPA (reduces fertility), GMO corn (reduces fertility), and on and on and on.

    Why is this stuff legal? Why is it so heavily defended? Why is there so much disinformation about this topic? Why are people paid to post disinformation in forums such as this one, all over the Internet (done by “sock puppets”, paid for with your tax money by the Pentagon, for “national security”)?

    The short story is… we have more than 150 central banks, all privately owned, one in each country worldwide. These central banks lend all governments money. This has been going on for 300 years (from the creation of the first central bank in Europe), well before your parents were born. Well before mass media was born. Well before propaganda was perfected across mass media.

    These central bankers are Malthusian Fabian socialists. Malthusian means they are very much into population control. They want to control our numbers. Fabian means they will do anything to push their agenda, they have no morals or belief in God or karma, and they work undercover over long periods of time by infiltrating existing institutions from the inside. They also relentlessly attack their opposition at all costs, calling them crazy.

    And they own or control most of the mainstream media. Essentially — they control the world from behind the scenes. Remember, your parents and their parents were born into this. If you are just becoming aware, this is why. Your parents are not to blame.

    The Malthusian piece means they will intentionally add toxins to your food and water, in a legal way. They want to see our numbers fall, by slowly toxifying us and reducing our birth rates. All the while, you are lead to believe none of this is happening, or that it is entirely in the realm of “conspiracy theory.” You know, the stuff of tinfoil hatters…. a very effective strategy created by central bankers for the purpose of keeping you in the dark. All they have to do is intriduce doubt, and you will never research it any further. They know this because they hire the best social engineers that money can buy.

    They (the Rockefellers, specifically) fund and push the abortion and birth control and planned parenthood agenda worldwide, too. It keeps our numbers low. It keeps our numbers safe for them. They want us to go from 6+ billion to less than 1 billion in the next 50 years or so. It’s not to protect world resources — there’s plenty to go around — they make that stuff up in the media they own, to get people on board with their philosophy.

    How do you remove fluoride from water? Contrary to popular belief, not by reverse osmosis filtering. DISTILLATION is the easy way, and the cheapest. Waterwise sells nice units for doing this.

    Do not believe the intentional disinformation that tells you distilled water is bad for you, that you need minerals in your water or you will suffer. You get 95% of your minerals from the foods you eat, not from your water. This is outright lies designed to create doubt and to keep you drinking toxins that make you stupid. Don’t believe it for a second.

    Spread the word. You owe this to everyone around you that you love, once you figure out how all of this works. Truth is spawned from love. Keep truth alive and well.

  • ken

    Here’s a question. who is it that regulates what level of any chemical is safe to digest or consume? hmmm. let me think. could it be a government run body? lol. I don’t want to sound paranoid but i’d rather question why something is done, rather then blindly follow some group that 60 years ago said it was o.k. to smoke cigarettes. what if it is true? what if its not? who knows maybe if someone could invent a way of sharing information globaly so you could look up statistics and answers yourself then maybe you might learn a thing or two. Who knows maybe you’ll find out that all the information they used for this “documentary” is wrong, but i would bet 90% of it is spot on and the other 10% is just a bit out of date.

  • Grandma Marianne

    Personally, I mistrust, question and inquire anything that is an additive to natural products. My experience? till I was 30 I was ill (3 chronic diseases) thin, tense, unhappy and a favorite of doctors of the body as well as mind..All of my medical experiences were failures, including an appendoctomy based on a mistaken diagnosis and an addiction to the tranquilizers given by a psychiatrist; .my lifestyle was a disaster and I feared I could not take life any longer. Then I made a total reverse and move to another country, and the first 6 months spent in an agricultural center just changed my body and soul. I took on 20 kilos, stopped smoking and drinking alcohol, dropped all medicines and started smiling and singing. Today (39 years later) I am a happy old lady, I have no medicines at home other than 2 bottles of vitamins, I work phisically and am strong as a horse and only make some standard medical exams every 3 years just because my social insurance requires it, and they all came perfect till now.

    I have a say which I repeat to my 10 grandchildren: Health, higiene and asthetics go hand in hand. I can recommend it. Follow it and you’ll most probably walk into the sunny side of the street!

    Grandma Marianne

  • Grim

    I smell Scientology propaganda here…Fluoride doesn’t strengthen your teeth,it disturbs the cellular metabolism of the bacteria that causes cavities.And yes it is toxic in a high amount
    but so are vitamins and a another the IQ doesn’t lower itself because of exposure to some substance…this has no scientific base.