HIV = AIDS, Fact or Fraud?

“Too many people are making too much money out of it, and money is much stronger than truth. One of the most powerful video documentaries of our time boldly reveals the modern medical-industrial complex’s dire descent into utter corruption. This feature-length expose explains exactly how the 300-Billion-dollar AID$ fraud began, why HIV can NOT be the cause of AIDS, what the real causes could be, and who manipulates the public’s good intentions while poisoning hundreds of thousands with toxic drugs that cause the very disease they are supposed to prevent.

This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$ machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide plight of human suffering and drove it down the road to hell. Yet this program offers hope, inspired by the courage and articulate arguments of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria. A MUST SEE for anyone interested in truly understanding the facts about HIV/AID$.

You will meet a number of highly reputable scientists who all agree that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, who was the first scientist to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. He is joined by Nobel Prize winners Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr.Walter Gilbert, along with Dr. David Rasnick, an expert in the field of protease inhibitors.

Is HIV/AIDS the golden idol of junk science? Judge for yourself. Professionally produced, written and researched, acclaimed by physicians, scientists, journalists and humanitarians internationally, this is the video encyclopedia of HIV/AIDS dissident movement! THE defining documentary on the HIV/AIDS fraud.”

From The Web
Join The Conversation
  • Angelique

    This is a very interesting alternative view to what we all officially know.

  • ilikedirrt

    I am not going to waste my breath pointing out everything wrong with this documentary. It is blatantly homophobic and completely scientifically inaccurate. Go take a class on microbiology.

    • Molosser

      I see you are questioning the findings of Nobel Price winning scientists.What is YOUR field of expertise and educational background?

    • Molosser

      I see you are questioning the findings of Nobel Price winning scientists.What is YOUR field of expertise and educational background?

    • Molosser

      I see you are questioning the findings of Nobel Price winning scientists.What is YOUR field of expertise and educational background?

  • Boycalledsue

    A simple explanation with what is wrong with the orthodox side of the aids issue. I suspect anyone who dislikes it didn’t really watch it.

  • Boycalledsue

    A simple explanation with what is wrong with the orthodox side of the aids issue. I suspect anyone who dislikes it didn’t really watch it.

  • Boycalledsue

    A simple explanation with what is wrong with the orthodox side of the aids issue. I suspect anyone who dislikes it didn’t really watch it.

  • Randomlythinkingaloud

    As someone who works in the medical field, you people are fucking retards if you believe this.

    HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) develops into AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome).

    I do believe on the other hand they will never release a cure for it, big pharma companies profit to much prolonging patients survival rather then curing it. Same as any type of preventative cancer treatments. 

    • Integral

      Wow, 

      I see that you have been totally indoctrinated. You have read and memorised som facts in your medical books and never ever tried to argue them, just learn the books do your job and get your 150 000$/year. 

      The people in this documentary are smart people with considerably higher degrees and experience than you in this filed. They critisize and think outside the box, thats how mankind evolves and always has, because some few smart people dared to stand upp against the mainstream media. Ever since the mediaval times brave philosophers, mathemaricans and astronomers have been executed by the church for the critique they provided.

      You say yo are in the medical field, yet you did not come with a single scientifical/medical argument to why those men in the documentary were idiots? They gave 10 reasons that made sense, you just got in here saying all believeing this are stupid and statet something any dumbass can type in in google and click on the first wikipedia link to find.

      Im a airline captain and I have a Phd in applied mathematics, I cant accept that 1+1=2 without a proof. Next time you post something, post something usefull and If you have an opinion, try to build a solid ground for it and defend it.

  • Hyungnam Gu

    AIDS presented a unique challenge of both ideas and technology. Fortunately, the technology necessary to identify HIV was just being developed for other purposes. The first AIDS patients were often afflicted by multiple infections and cancers, making the identification of a unique cause difficult.

    Clues

    One of the first clues to the cause of the AIDS epidemic was the mode of transmission. People who acquired AIDS were exposed to blood and body fluids of others with the disease. Hemophiliacs received multiple blood transfusions. Though the blood they received was filtered, they became ill. Viruses (and only viruses) were able to pass through these filters. Also, hemophiliacs were a more diverse group of people, without the other putative exposures of male homosexuals and IV drug users. This led epidemiologists and researchers to consider a virus as being the ultimate cause of AIDS, and not some combination of drugs, sexual practices, and co-infections.

    Another clue came from cell biology. The primary cell-type destroyed in AIDS is the CD4+ lymphocyte. There had been recent discoveries that retroviruses could infect CD4+ lymphocytes. In fact a model existed in HTLV-1, a virus that is blood borne and infects CD4+ cells. HTLV was one of the first viruses thought to cause AIDS. Once HIV was isolated, testing was developed, and HIV was found to be universally present in all people with AIDS, while no other agent was present in all of these patients. By 1984, HIV was found to be strongly attracted to CD4+ cells, was isolated from AIDS patients from many different areas, and similar viruses were found that caused AIDS in other primates.

    Also, people who have mutations of the CCR5 surface protein (which assists in HIV’s entrance to the cell) are resistant to HIV infection and AIDS. Also, drugs that inhibit HIV replication prevent progression to AIDS.

    Koch’s postulates

    These postulates, which are followed (at least generally) to prove the nature of an infectious agent, have been fulfilled for HIV. Some examples are given below, but it is hardly comprehensive.

    The microorganism must be found in all organisms suffering from the disease.

    Of course, “all” is difficult to prove, given that there may always be someone with AIDS who is not known to the medical system, but studies have consistently found HIV in AIDS patients, and it is standard practice to test AIDS patients not only for antibodies to HIV, but for HIV itself. Early studies of AIDS showed HIV in all patients examined.

    The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in a culture.

    This has been done.

    The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.

    This has been shown in both humans and simians.

    The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.

    While not done in humans in the lab, genotyping has allowed scientists to trace known exposures and specific viruses, fulfilling the postulate.