In the summer of 2005, a package arrived at the Hollywood offices of Highway 61 Entertainment from London with no return address. Inside were two mini-cassette audio tapes dated December 30, 1999 and labeled “The Last Testament of George Harrison”. A voice eerily similar to Harrison’s tells a shocking story: Paul McCartney was killed in a car crash in November of 1966 and replaced with a double! British intelligence, MI5, had forced the Beatles to cover up McCartney’s death to prevent mass suicides of Beatle fans. However, the remaining Beatles tried to signal fans with clues on album covers and in songs. Until now, the “Paul is Dead” mystery that exploded worldwide in 1969 was considered a hoax. However, in this film, the mysterious voice on the tapes reveals a secret Beatles history, chronicling McCartney’s fatal accident, the cover up, dozens of unknown clues, and a dangerous cat and mouse game with “Maxwell,” the Beatles’ MI5 handler, as John Lennon became increasingly reckless with the secret. The voice also claims that Lennon was assassinated in 1980 after he threatened to finally expose “Paul McCartney” as an imposter! Highway 61 Entertainment has investigated this stunning new account of the conspiracy to hide McCartney’s tragic death and produced this unauthorized documentary that includes newly unearthed evidence. The mysterious voice on the audio tapes narrates the entire film in what may prove to be the most important document in rock and roll history, leaving little doubt that PAUL MCCARTNEY REALLY IS DEAD! – Written by Highway 61 Entertainment
5.08
Rating: 5.08/10 based on 168 votes cast.
Advertisement
Join The Conversation
This documentary played like a Bad TV movie.There are strange and quiet obvious references to Mcartney in songs and album covers.But lets look at some facts
;Heather mills is far to young to be the Rita in this fairy tale.She has a past life of prostitution and deception
;There are noticeable differences in facial features (ears etc)
George does use the reference “Faul” in the last Australian interview,but this may be a insult.
But for me the most compelling evidence is in the music McCartney has produced in his solo career..The best was band on the run were he exploited Denny lane.
And I rest With the “frog Chorus”..
I never liked McCartney and he never came across well in Modern interviews..He is a “sell out” …up until recently a recluse.He came out of retirement because of the support for him during the ugly divorce from Heather…(CRAZY!!!)
Now he stands on stage and wobbles his head like a Beatles impersonator..Oh forgot he may be…This documentary for the most part is shit,but these kind of fakes can sometimes help to throw light these theories..
Oh and for the record that is not a convincing “scouse” accent..it was the equivalent of dick van dykes in Mary Poppins…Not the best… a bit Nigel Tuffnell…
ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!! I watched five minutes of this garbage and that guy on the tape DOES NOT sound like George Harrison. Totally stupid! Why would George send the tapes to a company that no one has ever heard of? Why wasn’t this on the news? I think this company is looking for some publicity
Okay.
If you watch this documentary all the way through (and surprisingly its actually worth it) it displays some very thought provoking connections. When I started watching it all I could think was, “this right here is another bullshit crock of lies made by some suspicious power-point wielding nerd”. But I figured if they’d already gone this far with it in only 20 minutes, I wonder how far they go with the rest of it. Having seen all the points they present to you, I have to admit there’s something that doesn’t fit. Having Paul slip up and play guitar right handed, having George refer to him as Faul and looking at all the emphasis on Paul’s exclusion from the group is interesting.
I don’t like that they never play anything from the tapes. But I could imagine someone piecing all of this together and needing something not only to tie it together but also to get people listening and making up the fantastic tale of a tape.
All in all its worth a watch. It had me and my friend (very skeptical people) actually considering the idea of a fake Paul.
Oh, I see, I’m now just reading some of the other comments and it seems that in the credits, they mention the voice over/naration as actually being done by someone other that G.H. It should be no surprise that few are watching this rubbish through to the end to even see the credits. Now that’s funny.
But regarding my previous comment: told you so.
My old man was a scouse though I didn’t grow up in England myself…point being, I’ve been listening to that accent since the day i was born…my dad, his siblings etc…and i can tell you for a fact: that is not George Harrison, simply because it’s a fake Liverpool accent. It’s wrong on so many words and their pronunciation. Good try folks, but no cigar this time.
Oh, and as a final comment from someone who is a sound engineer, that “testament” was NOT recorded on one of those dinky little hand held recorders. It was recorded on something with a much broader frequency response; no doubt a professional studio microphone of some variety. Again, good try people but you screwed up on too many obvious levels to even get close to convincing me.
Rita was Heather Mills? So Rita is a time Traveller!?
Heather Anne Mills (born 12 January 1968)
Pure and absolute fantasy almost worthy of an album in itself as told to me by one of the surviving 2
This would of been funnier if it were only 1/2 an hour long but the time labours the joke, I got bored after 20 mins (no I couldnt watch it all). The comments are funnier than the fake Docu and its amazing how people ignore the info in front of them, dumbly thinking its ‘Harrisons’ voice when it states quite clearly that it is narrated by a voiceover (as stupid as the overlong joke).
Only a bunch of fookin twats could have made up a rubbish like this.
I am shocked…
Truly… shocked.
Now, I know i’m one of the more gullible types on this planet, but this whole story just screams discomfort.
If there is a devil, I bet he’s laughing in joy about this story.
Could you imagine such a faith? Imagine you are the REAL Paul. His soul is forgotten. It’s replaced by an imposter. To me, it seems like a faith worse then death. That another person takes your places, effectivly banishing you to oblivion.
I’m shocked! It’s up to Ringo now… Ringo should step up and blow the lit of this story. Ringo is the one that can salvage Pauls soul. It might be the most important thing.
Ringo… For Paul…
Laughable accent.
Emm oyy fooive (MI5)
and a story which is probably more laughable.
‘No one must find out so John decide to leave hints on all of our albums and in our songs’
So bad its actually comedic.
..and very very bad photoshopping.
must try harder.
This is so bad it’s almost good. That is the worst Scouse accent I’ve ever heard. Moxwell?? Did he have a silver hammer?
No It’s true. I met George once at a party and commented on his strange accent: turns out in 1985 the ghost of Paul McCartney possessed a cough drop in the Harrison family medicine cabinet – which was consumed by the hapless George. Y’see Paul was unhappy that his death had been so obviously covered up and he chose to exact revenge on the former Beatles guitarist (and Liverpool native) by giving him an accent that would make anyone who had ever actually been to Liverpool want to curl up and cringe to death. Sad story really…
This is so stupid.
hahahaha,that is a funny accent,as if someone botherd to make this.
Wouldn´t it be more credible if george harrison´s voice narrates de documentary?
Embarrassingly awful. In no way is that the type of recording a person would make, in a hospital bed, the day after being stabbed. It is a written narration , not an excited utterance or any attempt to protect oneself from the nasty MI5…there is no evidence of first person recollections…I just have to stop. It was so bad, flawed and ridiculous. Nuff said.
A lot of this information can be researched. I saw a post somewhere that Paul’s parents couldn’t have been at the burial because his mother had already died. I looked up his Dad’s information and…voila…he remarried Angela Williams in 1964, two years before the date Paul allegedly died, so he did have living “parents”. And I have no doubt that his wife would have loved Paul, but even if she did not, and she loved her husband, she would have been at his side during such a tragedy. The one thing I really question is: if all of this material is a hoax, what is the purpose of perpetrating it? Now, I can see the purpose of hiding Paul’s death. I don’t think girls would have committed suicide. I was one of those girls. I would have been saddened, but personally George Harrison was my pick. I lived in this era: the ruling generation came up with some bizarre speculations to justify their efforts o suppress the young people of the time. Remember how they attacked hippies: those were just kids who were doing a 180 degree from the establishment. The media and those in power had a horrible and nasty way of attacking anything they didn’t like. When you look at the plethora of pictures and symbols on the albums themselves, read the lyrics, and listen to the music, it does all fit a pattern of grief and survivor’s guilt that is haunting. The entire world was shocked at the changes in the group after their initial couple of years of success. I remember all the criticisms of the men themselves and much of it was blamed on drugs, fame and wealth. As a fan, I certainly didn’t understand, although I could forgive and allow for the idea that fame had ruined them. But what if it didn’t? What if they were involved in something so sinister that they could hardly bear it? Paul was their friend. Ahh. I could go on and on but the Beatles did not evolve in a positive way. It became more and more morbid. And it was the Beatles generating the massive amounts of materials, was it not? I can see the purpose if they were covering up Paul’s death…and grieving…and torn apart with guilt over all the lies…if you tell enough lies, eventually your truth will be completely disintegrated and then who are you anyway? All four of them went undercover at the height of their fame. It was like a big family feud at the time. Except when they played music, you got the idea that they didn’t like each other anymore. I never understood the relationship with Paul and Linda. They were never apart except the time he went to jail. On the outside they appeared to be the soul mates of all time with all the resources in the world to live a happy life. Yet…could she have been his jailor? There is much to ponder here. And I also always wondered why Heather Mills was so vehement that she was going to “tell the truth” and ruin Paul. That in itself makes me think maybe the fourth Beatle was a phony named “Faul” who wanted the fame, no matter what. This documentary was real enough that I mourned Paul…and if it was phony, then people wake up, because that means media has the power to “fool even the elect if it was possible.”
The media has the power to “fool even the elect if it was possible”. …Seriously?! That comes from scripture. It’s given to Christians as a warning to not allow themselves to be deceived in the last days by the anti-Christ. The elect refers to God’s people…not fans of the Beatles.
As for Paul and Linda, he loved her. I think it’s that simple and she loved him. They raised a beautiful and successful family that have all grown to be successful adults. I don’t think you can raise such a wonderful family when you’re being imprisoned by a your wife. They had a real and loving relationship. He was her soul mate and she his.
As for Heather Mills, I think John Lennon said it best. “One thing you can’t hide is when you’re crippled inside”
Get a grip! Anyone living in this reality would instantly know that its all just a joke….
Chill out.
Repeat this mantra in the morning: IT WAS ONLY A JOE, IT WAS ONLY A JOKE…etc.
IT WAS ONLY A JOKE, IT WAS ONLY A JOKE…..
kkk dude wearing modern sunnies ???? js
I am guessing a lot of the people posting these comments hadn’t read the
credits as the narration and voice over was done by some guy
called Lance Lewman!
that’s not george harrison’s voice
LOVED this documentary so much I wrote a blog about it. http://rubylee1776.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/faul/
“George Harrison” is probably an impostor… but I could totally believe Faul is, too.
So they replaced a band member, because the CIA were scared girls were going to start committing suicide, then spent the rest of their careers mourning him and putting messages and symbols everywhere? What a load of bollocks! And his accent it a joke.
He loooved Paul-boo! Even this Yank could spot this bad accent, it sounds like me when I try to talk like a Beatle! For someone who just got stabbed -he sure sounded eerily calm and collected.
Sorry it does say narration and voice over editor! but even so I didn’t think for a second it was the voice of George Harrison which does make me think that if they really had these tapes they would of used some excerpts at least. Who knows but like i said i found it entertaining.
Entertaining viewing regardless whether its true or not. I am guessing a lot of the people posting these comments hadn’t read the credits as the narration and voice over was done by some guy called Lance Lewman!
Whoot a lood of boolocks!!! Even more disappointing than the unfinished Ramones docu. also on Doc. Heaven. (Disappointing coz it’s incomplete not coz it’s crap like this one.)
Proper funny this one. Its not even a proper scouser doing the voice over. I had to watch it though.
May I be the first to coin the phrase “Cockumentary”
I found this kinda interesting even if a lot of it seemed like coincedental rubbish. The backwards playing of records to show sentences like Paul is dead etc was rather ridiculous I think. Half of them didn’t even sound like what they said they were. You can make any kind of sentences from playing vinyl backwards… I thought it was meant to be satan speaking to us not the Beatles informing us Paul is dead we burried him blah blah blah. All in all though the things to do with the album covers was rather interesting to me. Shocking impression of Georges accent though.
All been said: bad scouse impersonation, and obviously being read from a script. All the ‘clues’ were as revealed in the late 60’s ……… excellent marketing ploy or weird coincidences? Suffice to say, John is dead, George is dead, but Paul & Ringo LIVE!
How on earth can they get away with making doucmentary like this ???
LOL WHATEVER NEXT
i’m Canadian…and only an American would think an english /scouse accent sounds that way…someone watched yellow submarine a few times…and still screwed it up even more…btw i’m from Liverpool Nova Scotia Canada…lol…
crap just crap , bad take on an old story ,
being a born and bred scouser that was the most offensive shite i’ve had the misfortune of watching i knew mick abrahms as he attended the same drug rehab workshop that i worked at he was convinced the beatles were all witches and constantly listened on a walkman now the twist is and this is 100% true what he listened to was oasis and he was convinced they were telling him to kill a beatle now as for this moxwell fellah pronounced maxwell well if he worked for him you can slap my arse and call me rita
for you trolls, i understand this might be extreme and all, but do explain at the end, in all the interviews live with george harrison, he never refers to paul as paul. not once, always Faul, ALWAYS. just saying… curious…
Jeezz……
It was clearly a voice-over the live interview interjected at precisely the right moment.
You also see above comment and repeat manta up to five times a day just to make sure that you have a firm grip on reality and are not going to go off the deep end any time soon….
oh and stay away from the remaining Beatles…just a thought…
Mantra** oops!
thats the crappest scouse accent i’ve ever heard!
its only a voice over reading from a script not actually the tape playing
i can do a better accent of george harrison than this idoit who done this
I’M VERY BORED.
You need to hold knowledge about the Beatles and their music before watching this documentary, otherwise you won’t be able to spot blatant errors.
Compliments of IMDb
The narrator states that Paul’s parents attended his funeral. In
reality, Paul’s mother, Mary, died from breast cancer while Paul was a
teenager.
The film states that the clues began to appear in the albums after
Paul’s Death on November 9th 1966. However, the first three albums that
the clues appeared in (“Rubber Soul”, “Yesterday… and Today” and
“Revolver”) all were released before the date of Paul’s supposed death
(“Rubber Soul” being the earliest in December 3rd 1965).
The film states that the final album recorded was ‘Let It Be’. However
in reality that album was recorded before ‘Abbey Road’ and even had a
bootleg of the sessions leaked to the public before ‘Abbey Road’ was
released in September 1969.
They replaced Paul to prevent the mass suicide of fans, then kill John themselves. Stupidity? or Bullshit?
Entertaining but not the evidence is conflicting as Rita who was the girl in the car with Paul McCartney in 1966 turns out to be Heather Mills who was born in 1968!!!!! Nice try though!!!!!
i am 19 mins into watching…
for the record i’m english, so i’ll just say that ‘george’s’ accent is pretty damn bad.
it may sound fairly convincing to an american but no-one here would believe it. so many of his syllables sound so massively wrong & blatantly fake, it’s certainly not a person from liverpool as george & the lads were. not a chance in hell. whoever released this video has been made a HUGE fool of. people, don’t be made 1 too!
i’ll watch a little more though, for a laugh.
The OPD patch, which they say in the documentary means “officially pronounced dead”, is actually the flash or badge for the Ontario Provincial Police, the OPP, from Ontario Canada. Check it out.
trololololololol
Wast of time. F-
Judging by the comments below, I may or may not decide to watch this. But, having tracked the Paul Is Dead hypothesis, I came across iamaphoney who has a somewhat jarring and disjounted assemble of over 100 videos presenting ‘evidence’. Convincing.
These Paul CARtney/CARTney stories began in 1969 so this documentary is simply a revival of the articles and news stories from that era.
A bit odd of George Harrison in his Friar Park mansion, Henley on Thames assuming Harri Chrisna would stop Abram’s Lot, after John Lennon’s comment that The Beatles had become “more popular than Jesus”.
Ya, nonsense but it would explain wings!
Haha true -just what I was thinking 🙂
What an absolute pile of crap….worst Liverpudlian accent. Hideous. This is not real. At all. That is all.