Aerosol Crimes (aka Chemtrails)

This documentary produced by chemtrail researcher Clifford Carnicom is a must see and an excellent research tool. Five plus years into the operations has provided ample evidence in this 90min DVD that covers many topics. Over the years aerosol/chemtrail research has provided some leads but even more questions as to who and why the spraying occurs. It is clear jets are deliberately spraying the sky’s and it will not stop until enough people are aware and willing to stand up for the operations exposure and termination.

Contrails can and should form readily in clean, cold, and dry air. Normal clouds, on the other hand, require higher moisture levels and a particulate, or aerosol base, from which to develop. The radical transformation of our sky is a direct result of aircraft activity, now forces us to address an entirely new set of conditions.

Aircraft are now repeatedly dispersing materials into the upper atmosphere at flight altitude, roughly from 35,000 to 40,000 feet. These materials expand rather than evaporate and they usually transform into an unsightful haze that over the recent years has decreased our general visibility down to ground levels. One of the remarkable facts is that this commonly now occurs at various low levels of relative humidity, on the order of 30 to 40 percent, instead of the 70 percent or greater that is associated with cloud formation. And so we know now that these are not clouds in any conventional sense, they are indeed a unique and artificial creation that now crosses new thresholds in the atmospheric and geophysical sciences.

Join The Conversation

10 Comments / User Reviews

Leave Your Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Experts on atmospheric phenomena say chemtrails do not exist, and that the characteristics attributed to them are simply features of contrails responding differently in diverse conditions in terms of the sunlight, temperature, horizontal and vertical wind shear, and humidity levels present at the aircraft’s altitude.[2][4][7][9][29] In the US, the gridlike nature of the National Airspace System’s flight lanes tends to cause crosshatched contrails, and in general it is hard to discern from the ground whether overlapping contrails are at similar altitudes or not.[4] The jointly published fact sheet produced by NASA, the EPA, the FAA, and NOAA in 2000 in response to alarms over chemtrails details the science of contrail formation, and outlines both the known and potential impacts contrails have on temperature and climate.[14] The USAF produced a fact sheet as well that described these contrail phenomena as observed and analyzed since at least 1953. It also rebutted chemtrail theories more directly by identifying the theories as a hoax and disproving the existence of chemtrails.

  2. It is well established by atmospheric scientists that contrails can not only persist for hours, but it is a perfectly normal characteristic for them to spread out into cirrus sheets. The different sized ice crystals in contrails descend at different rates, which spreads the contrail vertically. Then the differential in wind speeds between altitudes (wind shear) results in the spreading of the contrail across many miles/kilometers in the sky. This mechanism is similar to the formation ofcirrus uncinus clouds. Contrails between 25,000–40,000 feet (7,600–12,200 m) can often merge into an “almost solid” interlaced sheet.[33] Contrails can have a lateral spread of several kilometers, and given sufficient air traffic it is possible for contrails to create an entirely overcast sky that increases the ice budget of individual contrails and persists for hours.

  3. Jim Marrs has cited a 2007 Louisiana television station report as evidence for chemtrails. In the report the air underneath a crosshatch of supposed chemtrails was measured and apparently found to contain unsafe levels of barium: at 6.8 parts per million, three times the US nationally recommended limit. A subsequent analysis of the footage showed, however, that the equipment had been misused, and the reading exaggerated by a factor of 100—the true level of barium measured was both usual and safe.[5]

    In May 2014 a video that went viral showed a commercial passenger airplane landing on a foggy night, which was described as emitting chemtrails.[25] Discovery News pointed out that passengers sitting behind the wings would clearly see anything being sprayed, which would defeat any intent to be secretive, and that the purported chemical emission was normal air disruption caused by the wings, visible due to the fog.

  4. Mind Control and Chemtrails (Facts)
    Even in the U.S. congress appeared a bill proposing the ban of mind control technologies

    But this was only for a very short period of time. The bill was then changed and in the new bill the ban of those technologies was left out of the Space Preservation Bill. Neither the U.S. congress nor the U.S. president made ever an effort to ban mind control weapons. The European Parliament reacted as well to the launch of the HAARP system construction, when it called in 1999 for the ban of manipulation of human beings.

    Chemtrails and Electromagnetic Weapons – Globalism, Violent Oppression and Electronic Warfare: 2 + 2 = 5 –


  6. I’m curious about something: I want to know if people who believe in a conspiracy theory like this, ALSO believe in other popular conspiracy theories.

    How many of you believe in any of the following:

    – Morgellons Disease
    – Grey Aliens
    – 9/11 was an Inside Job
    – Reptilians walk among us
    – The Moon landings were fake
    – HAARP
    – The New World Order
    – Fluoridation in the water is killing us
    – The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

  7. I have started a Anti chem trail page on fb called stop chem trials in Scotland. Please like it and spread the word.

  8. 7/10
    – Some data and arguments are presented well.  Would have benefitted from summarizing some details, like the total number of independantly researching citizens, research projects, etc.
    – Plenty of cloud and nature footage, more variety could have been good.  Some interview scenes in the second half.
    – Music volume should be reduced while the narrator is speaking.  Although the music did not drown him out, it certainly did compete at times and force the listener to concentrate on what he was saying.
    – The narrator’s voice has an almost comically nasal quality, but it is easy enough to understand.
    – I am biased to view naturopathic medicine with skepticism, but I did not see much value in the relatively long interview (15 minutes) with the naturopathic doctor starting around the 56 minute mark. The value was supposed to be in support of, “What can people do to protect themselves from the aerosols.”
    – Some explanations proposed for the motivation for distributing aerosols were not supported well, unfortunately this gives the impression of conspiracy claims.

  9. I am sorry but due to the huge amount of disinfo and brainwashing going on around the world not to mention media manipulation I am so afraid the majority will never wake up and we need the majority. What are we going to do? thank you for the information