Burzynski: The Cancer Cure Cover-Up

A Polish native named Stanislaw Burzynski attended Lublin Medical University where he graduated first in his class at age 24 and received his PhD in biochemistry the following year. While undergoing his research to acquire his PhD, Dr. Burzynski made a profound discovery. He found a strain of peptides in human blood and urine that had never before been recorded in biomedical research.

As his curiosity in these peptides evolved he made another profound observation, people who were inflicted with cancer seemed to lack these newly discovered peptides in both their blood and urine while those who were healthy and free of cancer appeared to have an abundance of these peptides.

Dr. Burzynski theorised that if he could somehow provide a way to chemically extract these peptides from the blood and urine of healthy donors and administer these peptides to those with cancer perhaps it could be useful in treating the disease. The treatment became known as antineoplaston therapy and this is the story of Dr. Burzynski’s near 50-year journey to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials of Antineoplastons. Defying the face of skepticism, legal attacks from state and federal agencies.


Join The Conversation

8 Comments / User Reviews

Leave Your Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    HAVE ANY SIDE EFFECTS, DOES IT ACTUALLY WORK ? How can I contact Dr BURZYNSKI personally , does he have an email address? Thank you very much

    • I just joined his patient Facebook group. Well, I’m waiting for approval, but you might have a better chance of getting your questions answered.

  2. In addition to my previous comment on this controversial subject (Cancer) and in fairness to Physicians in general, I acknowledge some of the brilliant work they all do!
    The largest majority of us have and will continue to rely on and use the skills of our Doctors. My very deep seated feelings with regard to my former post will remain with me for ever. There has to be a better way than toxic treatment to remedy such a disease. Stuart.

  3. In the mid 90’s I lost my wife to Metastatic breast carcinoma!
    I will never forgive myself for allowing her to take any of the conventional treatment, We were persuaded to engage in by the Oncology people at the time. The constant blood tests, the fear tactics used to urge her to have Lymph glands removed without even consulting me as her Carer and responsibility! I know from just the control of nausea they used Maxolon which didn’t work effectively. I gave her ginger and we managed to control it without further issue. Anyone who tries to introduce an alternative substance other than the standard, is regarded as an Idiot, nut case or similar. Nobody wants to acknowledge your effort or credibility in succeeding with your own medicine. If this judgement can be justified by such people, then I say what a disgraceful failure on the part of the practitioners who have studied at University and can’t even save their patient! Further to this, ( My Wife was subjected to a visit to some butcher connected to the Oncology Department who wanted her to disclose all personal details so they could put her on massive doses of their poisonous medicine as an experiment) She was told to get all her paper work in order so that the outcome, if failed would all be covered. When she came home to see me that day she said she felt like throwing herself under a bus! I understand the creature who offered this horror to her, was shamed into apologizing to cover his offer of demise! They write you off as dead meat literally, in my experience. In summary – If you as a Medical Oncologist are so incompetent that you either can’t surmount your duty to save the patient, at least allow the carer to have a go at using their medicine under supervision when there is an agreement between all parties. After all, what have you got to lose. Anyone who knows anything about such a disease must know that to frighten a patient in this case is to incite an unfavourable outcome! I will never give any financial support to such a perceived conflict of interest. How is it that we can do some of the most incredible things with modern technology but apparently lack sufficient skill in saving a desperate patient who ha Cancer??

  4. that kessler guy, what a prick

  5. they dont want a cure for cancer, you just have to see what happened to royal raymond rife, also graviola fruit was proven to kill cancer cells 1000s of times more effective than chemo etc, but due to a stupid law a natural product cannot be patented, so it was shelved in late 70s or early 80s. just some reasons why i give absolutely nothing to cancer research

  6. Absolutely disgusting those with vested interest in an outdated fawled medical proceder. God willing GO Dr BURZYNSKI

  7. great ===>>> XTIONMOVIES 9.COM