Evidence of Revision is a 6-DVD, 8 hour long documentary series whose purpose is to present the publicly unavailable and even suppressed historical audio, video, and film recordings largely unseen by the American public relating to the assassination of the Kennedy brothers, the little known classified “Black Ops” actually used to intentionally create the massive war in Viet Nam, the CIA “mind control” programs and their involvement in the RFK assassination and the Jonestown massacre and other important truths of our post-modern time.
The U.S. Government’s Orwellian “Office of Public Diplomacy” has been in existence in various forms and under various names since World War ONE. The union of American governance and American corporate interests began in Abraham Lincoln’s day and the massaging of “public truth” began even before the Roman Empire.
The more you know about “real history” versus “official history”, the better equipped you are to see behind the lies of our times, even as they are told to you. Some of us knew what was really happening even before the second plane hit the tower.
I just like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I’m fairly certain I’ll be told plenty of new stuff proper here! Good luck for the next!
My book, “Eyes Wide Shut: An Enigma” is fiction based upon actual events. The reality of the public has been skewed since the beginning.
Mind control in various strategies and applications has always been part of the process of government. Caesar set up an efficient provincial administration to govern the vast territories; he published his history The Gallic Wars. In this “history,” he skewed for his own benefit. Nothing has changed. Nixon was known to mold events to suit his reality… The frightening idea is accountability – the lack thereof. As my book refers to a rogue general hiding in plain sight of “black-box” hidden unlimited financing is not accountable. There are leaders with their own hidden agendas…
This segment with Serrano maybe should be excised, because it’s very obvious that she has made up her story, and the interrogator has clearly seen through her claims, and is trying to get her to admit she’s fabricating shit. Maybe integrating herself into this big social event gave her some perverse validation or something.
I watched the same thing you did and took it quite differently. What’s the point in trying to get her to recant. If the interviewer (you interview witnesses and interrogate suspects) disbelieved her account he should simply disregard her statements. There’s no point in trying to get every one he questions in an investigation to agree to his predetermined version of events that he himself did not see.