Advertisement

Married To The Eiffel Tower

This Documentary explores the world of three women who are sexually and emotionally attracted to objects. These so-called ‘objectum sexuals’ shy away from contact with other humans in favour of structures large and small.

Naisho, an American woman, has been lovingly connected with the Golden Gate Bridge, has a fence for a lover in her bedroom, used to be in love with an archery bow and is now officially married to the Eiffel Tower.

Together with Naisho and the documentary crew, a swedish woman introduces us to some of her lovers – a guillotine and a fence, and another American woman gives us an insight to her three greatest lovers in this world. A carnival fun ride, a church fence and the Empire State building in New York.

It is a journey into the notions of love, tolerance, freedom of choice in our modern world, and a road towards understanding objectophilia better.

Join The Conversation

243 Comments / User Reviews

Leave Your Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I lasted up to the marriage ceremony on the Eiffel Tower. My discomfort prompted me to think that this must be very similar to what the public in Victorian England experienced when they paid to see the lunatics in the local Bedlam asylum!. It should be blindingly obvious that these women are psychotic i.e. clinically detached from reality. The fact that one of them
    became an archery world champion or the fact that they seemingly articulate their “positions” well are not mutually exclusive from them being logically/emotionally dysfunctional i.e insane! In all similar cases the diagnosis is almost guaranteed childhood psychic trauma; the earlier it happens, the more severe the consequences. Also I believe that a trauma itself can be a significant trigger for true creativity, a catharsis; but when this creative drive is expressed in fields which demand much public adulation, this invariably also has tragic outcomes.

  2. Ya. I feel bad for these people because of their horrible pasts, but wow, they’re insane. Relating to the Berlin Wall’s personality is next level crazy, and they all have so many “partners” that its hard to believe that they are actually in love with any of them.

  3. I feel this way about food

  4. How long does it take for the cringe to ware off after watching this?

  5. Umm that first lady is either an object whore or has an open relationship. How on God’s green earth do you cheat on the Gold Gate Bridge with a piece of a fence and the Eiffel Tower? Straddling that picket fence looked like it hurt but whatever floats their boat.

  6. Thanks for the laugh in the first part.

  7. Why would you ever agree to a person that says it’s ignorant to view towers as blocks and wood?

  8. This has me wondering if necrophilia is a form of objectum sexuality. The cold concrete wall, the cold cadaver. I prefer humans, but I know what it’s like to feel enveloped by a place, to feel inspired by the land, to feel knocked out by the beauty of an object like neon green Lamborghini my physician owns. That is one sexy car.

  9. I wild cringe ride from start to end.

  10. taahahaha – i cannot understand–

  11. At first I did not know what to think until she broke down at the church and I could see she just wanted to be accepted.

  12. I don’t understand all the hateful comments – yeah it’s really weird but they’re not hurting anyone. I get the feeling half the people didn’t even watch most of the documentary before posting. It probably is a coping mechanism after all of the heartache and abuse, but the objects can still “reject” them. After all, didn’t the main lady “fall out” with her lover bow? Either way, I don’t see this as any worse than people who have sex with dolls or jerk off to anime. Heck, even using with sex toys is sort of in the same field. The only difference is that in this case love is involved instead of interacting with an inanimate objects purely for the sex and these women are open about it, unlike the basement dwelling waifu weirdos.

  13. I’ve been giggling for the past hour. this is one of the funniest fucking things I’ve ever seen, and the best part is there being super serious about everything. I feel like I’m Eric Cartman in the southpark episode “With Apologies to Jesse Jackson” when he is laughing uncontrollably at the Dwarf. dose this make me a bad person?this is how i feel

  14. 9 cats! thats a huge surprise!

  15. this is the funniest god dam movie I’ve ever seen!!!

  16. The only problem I see with this is how many lovers these people have. How can they be in love with 5 different things? That’s not a very good relationship if you say you love a bridge, but also love a fence, that doll, a crossbow and being married to the eiffel tower.

  17. actually why do we care to label. if it is not hurting us or other parties.

    Otherwise completely unnecessary.

  18. I am incredibly open minded, but this… this is something else altogether. No amount of study I have done in the field of Psychology could have prepared me for what I have just seen.

  19. Well, they aren’t hurting anyone. If this is their coping mechanism, I guess it is how it is. That said, clearly these women are ill — and I wouldn’t liken this to a sexual orientation at all. The fact that these women believe that the objects love them back or can communicate with them via telepathy is what really shows this to be a mental illness. The women are imagining a made-up world where objects have volition and experiences. Of course, this is a fantasy only real in their brains, but not in reality — so, crazy it is.

    Fascinating too….

  20. … I have the weirdest boner right now

  21. WHAT WAS THAT, These people need serious help.

  22. Sometimes I contemplate if folks truly take time to write something original, or are they only just dishing out words to fill a site. This surely doesn’t fit that mold. Thank you for taking the time to write with awareness. From Time To Time I look at a page and question whether they even proofread it.Fantastic work with this article.

  23. they are crazy.

  24. This certainly stretched the limits of my sensibilities, but I am happy to know there is a community of support for these people — it must be very difficult because they are so different. I just find it hard to hear them talk about being loved back or the feelings of objects – it screams of how humans need to be needed and loved, despite fear of rejection or pain; it makes me sad for them.

  25. ….im so disturbed right now

  26. these woman are gorgeous and intelligen. Hearing there pasts i can understand why they distance themselves from people which is a shame. But- they seem happy.

  27. im scared loooool

  28. If these objects really DO have feelings, how do we know the objects don’t feel like whores or rape victims?  Sex without permission…raise your hand if you’re in favor of that.  It’s like that guy who says that wife-beating is a way of expressing love.  Seriously, buy a dildo; they came into this life with that purpose in mind.

  29. the only good thing about France is the tower.

  30. these women have found a solution to  life’s pain. what do you cure yours with?
    also they have found an outlet for sensitivity, tenderness and passion -what is yours?
    Do you still have any? most of us lose it by the age of 9.
    they are not hurting anyone-they are keeping something within themselves alive-that takes courage and strength. we could all use help when it comes to connecting with other people-if they have their reasons to be farther behind in this or to have given up on it – who the fuck are we to judge-.

  31. Wow… I like it.. Nice Blog……

  32. The thing that bothered me the most was that she didn’t accept her trophy at the beginning. Come on! I understand you were the former champ, but 3rd place is still pretty good.

  33. Lol! They need to take them to a strip club and see if they like any objects in there.

  34. I actually thought this was satirical.

  35. I’m not sure whether I’m convinced these women are crazy or are incredibly traumatized and incapable of handling a human relationship for fear of rejection. Miss “sex in church” had never even attempted any type of relationship w/ a person. A thing will never be able to say no. I mean, note how all the telepathic communications with an object resulted in “positive” conversation. Not one object telepathically rejected the women. It’s all in their imagination. The “Eiffel Tower Girl” was molested and abused throughout her life. Of course she can’t relate to men. These women have been stiffened against people. Notice how the bald fat one said “this is the first time people will listen to me.” They just don’t know how to deal w/ people.

  36. …Well…There really are a billion different ways to go barking mad. Some of the people in this doc. seemed to be mentally ill (apart from their…unique…love interests). Mme. Tour Eiffel, however, seemed to be incongruously ordinary & that’s what made it so disturbing (over & above the EEEEWWW factor) to see her do what she did.

  37. this is a very odd phenomenon, but if it makes them happy, there really isn’t anything wrong with it.

  38. this is a very odd phenomenon, but if it makes them happy, there really isn’t anything wrong with it.

  39. Ok, just a little bit weird 🙂

  40. That was soooo fukn weird… and if u think im closed minded for thinking that.. then I guess im closed minded…. WTF Having said that, maybe these objects are transformers and we just havent seen that yet….

  41. That was soooo fukn weird… and if u think im closed minded for thinking that.. then I guess im closed minded…. WTF Having said that, maybe these objects are transformers and we just havent seen that yet….

  42. I think this is pretty fantastic! Now I would never want to engage in such things cos I like men too much!, but i do remember having some grinding fun with a bedpost when I was a child. 😮 It just felt nice!  Ok, maybe they dont grow out of it and so what.. Why do we always think we have to label each other?.. Whats normal these days anyway?We are all bonkers!aND I dont think there is an underlying need to be intitmate with humans SO Enjoy ladies!! x.haha!! Life would be allot easier if we all fancied objects! Loved this docu! xx

  43. what the shit.

  44. I think every homophobic pastor needs to see this. If a pastor can accept an objectosexual, then accepting a homosexual shouldn’t be such a stretch.

  45. Oh my GODD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    BULL shit!!!

    This isn’t a sexual disorder it’s somekind of weird-ass skitzophrenia and some kind of fear of people. these people aren,t victoms of a disorder, they,re victims of a HUGE lack of love, amnd being retarded. I mean all of them have bad family structure and found comfort in objects. They’re just stupid-ass people who went overboard with a coping mechanism. I mean Amy is actually retarded!!!! and she has Asbergers!!! HELLO!! Not a real disorder!

  46. This disorder is bullshit! I have a bachelor degree in Psychology, and diagnosis of “disorders”such as these, by some rouge ‘practitioners’, does nothing help the discipline of Psychology to be looked upon as a proper scientific discipline, it does nothing the bolster the credibility of psychology amongst the scientific community. 
    It’s cut from the same fallacious cloth as DID (dissociative identity disorder) or otherwise known as “multiple personality disorder”. Most probably these women suffer from an anxiety disorder or schizophrenia but instead the media have chased the latest ‘pop-psychology’ chic trend and presented it as true – a valid and reliable measure. Again, continuing to undermine the authority and substance of other “real” mental illnesses.

    I doubt we will be seeing this disorder in the DSM-V.

    • As a psychologist I think you should understand that psychology will never be a solid or stable discipline, the brain, our views, and society are constantly changing – meaning so is our science. To truly make a difference in this field you need to be open to all mental differences because who’s to say that in the next millenia the social norm won’t be something similar to this or even stranger. You don’t need to condone or agree, but we need to offer our empathy and understanding to help further our discovery of ‘us’.  Also, while I am happy that you have achieved a bachelor degree in psychology, that hardly makes you an expert in the field. Truly, no one is. If past psychologists responded to every diagnosis in the DSM-V with your choice of distaste and disbelief we would still be diagnosing improper mixtures of black and yellow bile and performing lobotomies.Freud, Erikson, Lewin, Bandura, Pavlov, Rogers etc approached their clients with an open mind and trust, leading to what we now consider ‘accepted’ psychological conditions. Try to give these women the same respect.

      • i don’t usually comment on comments, because etc, but Passerby is entirely correct. For a psychologist, T Phelan, you have a very closed mind.

      • This person is not a psychologist… they just have a BS (or worse a BA) in Psychology. It’s like reading a bunch of medical books and then hanging a shingle “Surgeon for Hire”.  He may know a lot of the common terminology, some history, and some methodology, but is by no means a psychologist, which is well proved by your point that he is closed-minded and spits out rhetoric that smacks of “my professor said so”.

      • This person is not a psychologist… they just have a BS (or worse a BA) in Psychology. It’s like reading a bunch of medical books and then hanging a shingle “Surgeon for Hire”.  He may know a lot of the common terminology, some history, and some methodology, but is by no means a psychologist, which is well proved by your point that he is closed-minded and spits out rhetoric that smacks of “my professor said so”.

        • Who cares. Experience with people gives you some idea of the diversity of people in the world, and how they as individuals relate to their own personalities, emotions, and issues. As for the true nature of what’s going on, that’s entirely an academic issue. T Phelan isn’t denying their experience, he’s just denying a certain characterization of it. That’s an issue of theory, not practice.
          Passerby wants to argue that psychology should adopt a stance that whatever people say is going on is the objective reality of things, because that gives the individuals the most respect. But people also always change, and discard the way they once viewed of things as false, and in retrospect they wish they would have done that sooner. So I don’t know if that gives the most respect towards people.

          At any rate, that particular debate is a theoretical debate, so representing practicing psychologists as a better authority is kind of misleading.

      • This person is not a psychologist… they just have a BS (or worse a BA) in Psychology. It’s like reading a bunch of medical books and then hanging a shingle “Surgeon for Hire”.  He may know a lot of the common terminology, some history, and some methodology, but is by no means a psychologist, which is well proved by your point that he is closed-minded and spits out rhetoric that smacks of “my professor said so”.

  47. So, if they’re like, “doing it” with more than one object, does that make them like, hoes?

  48. im a little torn, the openminded part of me tells me love holds no bounds, and so on, but what i really see is people who have either been sexually abused, or lost somebody, and thus cannot handle a real relationship, its just easier to love something that has no will and can never really disappoint you,

Load More Comments